User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

File:1989.09.17 - Acté de décès de Noémie Lidie HUDEBINE.jpg

As far as death certificates in France go, are they above or below the ToO? Inclined to think above, but I wanted your input first. Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. These are very standard text, and there is no room for originality. I updated the license and the information. Yann (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo supprimée sur accusation erronée

La photo Francesca Musiani.png a été supprimée à tort. Elle n'a pas été récupérée sur une des pages Web citées et j'ai l'autorisation de l'auteur de la photo (ainsi que du sujet). Merci d'annuler cette suppression. Bortzmeyer (talk) 08:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bortzmeyer: Bonjour,
Merci de demander au détenteur des droits de confirmer l'autorisation de publication via COM:VRT/fr. Ceci est nécessaire pour tout document dont vous n'êtes pas l'auteur, ou publié aupravant ailleurs. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed license

Hi, friend. I think you're free at this moment. So can you review the license for my uploaded photos in categories here:

Category:Wowy

Category:Bùi Công Nam

Category:Soobin Hoàng Sơn

Category:BB Trần

Category:Namcito

Category:Bảo Nhân

Category:Uyển Ân

File:H'HEN NIÊ (cropped).png

File:PHAN THỊ MƠ.jpg

Category:Jarinporn Joonkiat

Category:Lâm Bảo Ngọc

Category:Myra Trần

File:DƯƠNG HOÀNG YẾN.png

Category:Thùy Anh

That's all. Hope you done all of these. Have a nice day. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 15:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ubuntu 24.04 Noble Numbat Desktop English.png

Hey, I saw you recently deleted this for NETCOPYVIO. I wonder what the basis? Ubuntu is free software, and the screenshot was taken by the uploader. Aaron Liu (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aaron Liu: The image displayed is not free. Yann (talk) 11:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it a {{Freescreenshot}}? Aaron Liu (talk) 11:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, would you kindly respond? Thanks. Aaron Liu (talk) 17:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aaron Liu: Is the image displayed directly from the installation? Yann (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what that means. The uploader says they installed Ubuntu in a VM and took a direct screenshot, and I see no reason not to trust them. Aaron Liu (talk) 10:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK fine. Yann (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I just saw that the file page was vandalized to remove licensing information. Could you check if the user has other deleted contributions? Thanks again! Aaron Liu (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted everything, and warned the user. Yann (talk) 11:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Import sur Commons de rééditions de livres publiés initialement il y a plus de 95 ans

Bonjour, @Yann, je suis en train de préparer l'import des ouvrages disponibles de Creator:Colette qui entre dans le domaine public le 1er janvier prochain. Un certain nombre d'entre eux sont des rééditions des années 1960 à 1990 de livres publiés initialement il y a plus de 95 ans. Ces rééditions sont-elles admissibles sur Commons, ou devrais-je plutôt les importer directement sur Wikisource ? Cunegonde1 (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cunegonde1: Bonjour, Si c'est exactement le même texte, il est dans le domaine public. Mais, 1. C'est difficile à vérifier. Il est souvent indiqué « édition mise à jour / augmentée », mais dans le cas contraire, cela demande de comparer le texte d'origine avec l'édition récente. 2. C'est rarement le cas. Il y a souvent des ajouts récents : une préface, une introduction, des notes, etc., qui ne sont pas dans le domaine public. Désolé, c'est un peu une réponse de Normand... ;o) Yann (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merci @Yann, parfois la version d'origine est indiquée, d'autres fois c'est la date de copyright d'origine qui est indiquée, par exemple sur des livres de poche des années 60. Bon, le plus simple pour moi est d'importer sur Wikisource les textes dont je suis certain qu'ils sont DP. Il arrive que j'ai des scans d'origine, mais qui sont tellement pourris, que c'est plus simple d'utiliser un scan plus récent. Merci pour ton aide. Cunegonde1 (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Збережена плиточка.jpg

Why did you delete it so fast? It is only first day of nomination. It is photo of tiles in historical building, and human legs are needed to underastand what size of tiles (for comparison). This photo may be useful for article about this building. Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Yann (talk) 16:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Bad faith"

Yann, you are an admin. You presumably know User:Rosenzweig is not acting in bad faith in the Harcourt matter, but you keep making that accusation. Please knock it off. Genuine disagreement is not bad faith on either side. Frankly, given the precautionary principle, he has a damned good case. - Jmabel ! talk 19:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Sorry, but I lost good faith with Rosenzweig. In the new nomination, there are images which are obviously OK. How can good faith be assumed when he nominated again the same images with the same wrong rationale? Also grouping several rationales into one DR is bad. But he does it again here. This looks like just a personal war against these pictures. And I am not alone thinking that. Yann (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are serious in the accusation that he is acting in bad faith, take it to COM:AN/U and be prepared to make your case. If not, drop it. And certainly a DR is not the place to argue the conduct of any longstanding member of the community. - Jmabel ! talk 19:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This could be done, but I still hope it won't be necessary. I usually look for a reason for keeping an image. When there is none, the image must be deleted. In opposite, Rosenzweig looks for reason for deleting images at all costs. More than that, he has a wrong understanding of copyright and public domain. Copyright is not a black and white story. It is mostly nuances of grays, specially for old pictures. He also pretends to know more than French people how copyright management is done in France. So he is antagonizing dozens of people with his insistence of deletion with bad rationales. All this is simply damaging for the projects. Yann (talk) 19:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Terteryan

Hi since it seems you handled the other uploads perhaps you can assist with this too: given history of the uploader using images taken by others, this File:Sebastian Terteryan jpg.jpg is somewhat unlikely own work either. I'm unsure how to proceed, there's a similar but not identical here https://www.tiktok.com/@sebtheboxer TherasTaneel (talk) 07:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I found the source, deleted. Yann (talk) 09:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gperez24.jpg

Hola Yann, ¿por favor, me podrías decir exactamente cual es la evidencia que quieres encontrar en la foto para asegurarte que la foto es mía? Yo personalmente saqué esa foto el pasado mes de octubre y en la autoria de la imagen indique que poseo el copyright. No entiendo el motivo por el cual se pone en duda mi autoría, cuando he subido otras fotos de manera similar y no he tenido problemas. Gracias por adelantado. UN cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 09:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hard: Please upload the original image with EXIF data. This is good portrait by the way. Yann (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola @Yann, muchas gracias por tu rápida respuesta. Voy a buscar el original y lo subiré directamente a Commons con los datos que comentas. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 09:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
<Google Translate>Sube la imagen original con los datos EXIF. Por cierto, es un buen retrato.</Google Translate>

Hola de nuevo, @Yann: , acabo de subir la foto. Espero que todo esté correcto. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hard: File:Gperez2024.jpg n'est pas l'image originale, mais une version très réduite, et sans EXIF data. Si vous ne pouvez pas importer l'image originale, merci d'envoyez une autorisation via COM:VRT/es. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
<Google Translate>File:Gperez2024.jpg no es la imagen original, sino una versión muy reducida, y sin datos EXIF. Si no puede importar la imagen original, envíe permiso a través de COM:VRT/es.</Google Translate> Yann (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Yann,
Acabo de enviar el correo:
Por la presente declaro que soy el titular de los derechos de autor exclusivos de Gperez2024.jpg [1].
Consiento publicar dicha obra bajo la licencia libre Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (BY-SA-4.0).
Reconozco que concedo a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades.
Soy consciente de que siempre retendré los derechos de autor de mi imagen, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para mi obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no me serán atribuidas.
Soy consciente de que la licencia libre sólo afecta a los derechos de autor, y me reservo del derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas.
Reconozco que no puedo retractarme de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia.
(He firmado con mi nombre real (Hard)]
1 de noviembre de 2024.
Espero que esté todo correcto. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda!. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 14:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hard: This should be sent to permissions-es@wikimedia.org. Thanks, Yann (talk)
@Yann: si, disculpa por no incluir el destinatario en mi mensaje. El mensaje que te envié lo había enviado a la dirección que me señalaste. Gracias de nuevo. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: ya está solucionado. MUchas gracias por tu valiosa ayuda, sin la cual posiblemente no habría podiso solucionar este asunto. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2014 in Occitanie

Bonsoir, un grand merci pour ton aide. Your request is malformed m'a été d'un grand secours pour ne pas comprendre en quoi elle était malformée. En tant qu'enseignant, j'apprécie autant de pédagogie. Bonne soirée. --Birdie (talk) 17:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

I'd love to know how exactly a multi-paragraph section explaining what "Monuments historiques" are with a "see also" and "External links" section isn't "encyclopedic content." I guess I could just renominate it for G1 since it only has a single image but the whole thing really just comes off as pointlessly nitpicky and I'm sure you'd come up with some other reason to revert it anyway. Adamant1 (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I don't really care if you revert me but I would like an explanation and/or for to tell me what I should use instead if G2 isn't valid. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I recently had a logo removed and a copyright strike added, but the logo was just plain text. Could you please help me to understand how that TV show logo was above the threshold of originality when the Amtrak logo on the Commons:Threshold of originality page is not? I genuinely don't understand what I did wrong, or how I misunderstood what the threshold is. Additionally, isn't the logo able to be retained for the namesake Wikipedia article (here) since there isn't a copyright free replacement? Thank you in advance for clarifying this. Pastelitodepapa (talk) 08:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pastelitodepapa: Hi, The text might be OK, although there is a complex 3D effect, but the background is certainly not. Yann (talk) 08:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay, if I remove the background to just show the text logo for the show would that be okay with Wikimedia standards? Or is the simple vertical text drop-shadow enough originality to merit copyright? It doesn't look like a complex 3D effect to me to be honest. If not, am I able to upload the original image I had to Wikipedia to use just on its specific page since there isn't a copyright-free substitute for the show's logo of poster as is done on this Wikipedia page of another TLC show for instance? I'm just trying to understand how to do this all correctly. Thank you again. Pastelitodepapa (talk) 08:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pastelitodepapa: Not sure, you better ask on COM:VPC to have a second opinion. Yann (talk) 09:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you deleted the following photos :

They received a copyright violation because they are indeed on the INaturalist site but the author of these photos: Esteban Prat is a very good friend of mine, we see each other often and the latter authorized me (written proof to support) to use these photos. How can I do so that the photos are not deleted? Best regards JeSuisTropSalty (talk) 16:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JeSuisTropSalty: Please ask the author to change the license on INaturalist. Non commercial licenses are not accepted on Commons. Then you can ask for undeletion on COM:UDR. Yann (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably sockpuppets

Hi Yann,
I found a group of probable puppets.

Similar uploads (out of scope) on similar topics. Also, there are similarities in usernames.
With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aspects of twentieth century painting, 1963.pdf

File:Aspects of twentieth century painting, 1963.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Omphalographer (talk) 03:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann&oldid=953360502"