User talk:Strainu

TUSC token 752838f275954e272a790bc4be107d00

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Logo rapid.gif

File:Logo rapid.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Samucon (talk) 22:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Strainu!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Trandafir roșiatic.JPG was uncategorized on 1 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drabenco.jpg

According to the original information, file source was: =National Archives of Moldova, Personal File R-3335 and date= 1970. Did NA of Moldova send this permission? Because you said "author", but author was claimed to be unknown, so I have huge doubts about this file legal status. Masur (talk) 13:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harta transportului în comun București.svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Biserica_greaca

Da, ma scuzati, am 2 imagini pe care le-am pus aiurea. Nu cred ca am vreo sansa sa castig.... nu am aparat profesional momentan, pentru ca l-am pierdut in tren .... prostia se plateste :)) . Daca ar fi vreo sansa sa castig, as continua si cu celelalte poze sa le trimit. Voi ajunge la peste 100 Baditastefan (talk) 22:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

nu ma descurajez

nu ma descurajez, doar ca nu am timp zilele astea. am cateva monumente rare in galati, si sper sa aduc vreo 2 sau 3 ... macar sa castig si eu ceva. nu cred ca as putea sa ajung la finala pentru america. fac asta din placere pentru galati, ca are multe de oferit. Baditastefan (talk) 21:44, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interviu WLM

Am primit prin e-mail mesajul referitor un eventual interviu pentru WikiLovesMonuments.ro. Eu sunt disponibila oricand pentru interviu Korinna (talk) 19:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Strainubot

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are no objection to new task, so you could proceed bravely :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Strainu. You have new messages at Takeaway's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

- Takeaway (talk) 08:51, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images better names

العربية ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded [[:{{{1}}}]] and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

_→AzaToth 19:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Strainu,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ORTS check

Salut! Am observat că ești singurul utilizator care apare simultan în categoriile User ro și Commons OTRS volunteers, așa că te rog să te uiți peste solicitarea de la Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Ticket number #2011030410006577. Dacă tot ești pe pagina aceea și ai ceva timp, te rog uită-te și la următoarea solicitare (Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Star Academy Winner 2008.jpg, File:Nader Guirat Crimea Music Fest.jpg, File:OxyMore.jpg), că n-am primit niciun răspuns de vreo două săptămâni. Mulțumesc, Razvan Socol (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject Dacia

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA

and WP:DACIA

to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:26, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GPS-ul

Am raspuns pe pagina mea. Sarbatori fericite! --Codrin.B (talk) 17:28, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dacia kaerius.jpg, File:Dacia lorenz fries.jpg etc

Ai cumva rezolutii mai mari la hartile astea? Sunt faine, pacat ca nu sunt mai mari.--Codrin.B (talk) 21:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cine e autorul la harta asta File:Sebastian Munster - Tabula europae IX (Dacia).jpg?--Codrin.B (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Imagini din cărțile lui Cornel Lupea

Salut! Vezi, te rog, Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Ticket number #2007100310004441 și ro:Discuție_Utilizator:AdiJapan#Imagini din cărțile lui Cornel Lupea. Mersi, Razvan Socol (talk) 10:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments Romania

Buna. As vrea sa particip sau sa ajut in vreun fel la organizarea Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2012. Ce pot sa fac ca sa devin si eu membru in echipa de organizare. Multumesc. --Codrin.B (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

N-am primit nimic de la Nicu. Cand e deadline? N-as vrea sa se piarda momentumul de anul trecut. Exista deja site, category, unealta de upload in romana etc. Nu cred ca ar fi mult de facut pentru un WLM Romania 2012.--Codrin.B (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Colaborare cu Dacoromanica.ro

Exista vreo colaborare intre WikiMedia si Dacoromanica.ro? Exista foarte multe materiale acolo pe site care cred ca sunt PD si ar fi foarte util de importat pe commons.--Codrin.B (talk) 20:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Muzeul Național al Hărților și Cărții Vechi

Am creat

National museum of maps and rare books, Bucharest

	Native name	Muzeul Național al Hărților și Cărții Vechi
	Location	Bucharest
	Coordinates	44° 27′ 25″ N, 26° 05′ 34″ E
	Established	2003
	Website	www.muzeulhartilor.ro
	Authority file	: Q18542278 VIAF: 1121151898606924190006

Doua intrebari/probleme:

Ai cumva o image cu cladirea care o putem folosi?
Stiu ca e ok sa avem nume de imagini, probabil si de categorii in alte limbi pe Commons, dar mi se pare ca ar fi mai bine sa avem toate categoriile de muzee si monumente in engleza. Daca te uiti la Category:Museums in Romania by city, jumate sunt in engleza, jumate in romana. Eu as prefera engleza, in felul asta toti cei ce contribuie la commons ar gasi mai usor imaginile si categoriile. Oricum, as prefera sa fie totul intr-o singura limba. Acelasi lucru se intampla si cu Category:Muzeul Național al Hărților și Cărții Vechi. Multe institutii (dar nu toate) sunt in limba engleza si au acelasi nume cu categoriile care le corespund. Exemple Institution:National Museum of Transylvanian History, Institution:Byzantine & Christian Museum. O situatie similara de amestec romana/engleza se intampla si cu Category:Fortresses in Romania si multe alte categorii de acest gen. Tu ce zici? O sa deschid discutia si pe Village pump sa vad ce zice lumea.

O sa lucrez mai departe la o galerie pentru muzeu. Mersi --Codrin.B (talk) 21:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Raspunsuri

Multumesc pentru raspunsuri. Am mutat discutiile intr-un singur loc, in cazul asta la mine pe pagina, si am raspuns acolo. --Codrin.B (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject Romania

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diacritice pe Commons

Salut. Stiu ca tu ai pus mult efort pe ro Wiki cu conversia diacriticelor. Pe en Wiki am vazut tot felul de conflicte si deocamdata pare nerezolvata problema. Dar care e sugestia ta pentru commons? Avem categorii de genul Category:Reșița in contrast cu Category:Night in Reşiţa. As vrea sa pun ceva la Commons:WikiProject Romania/Guidelines legat de asta. Cred ca aici ar fi o mai mare deschidere pentru o standardizare mai rapida. Mersi. --Codrin.B (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La en.wp am susținut că o standardizare este prematură. Vezi argumentele mele aici. Cam aceleași lucruri sunt valabile și la commons, mai puțin faptul că e o non-problemă. En.wp e strict în engleză, pe când commons vrea să fie multilingv. Dar atâta timp cât oamenii scriu 50/50 cu cele 2 tipuri de diacritice, orice efort de standardizare presupune acțiuni corective la un moment dat. O sugestie este însă binevenită, iar aceasta nu poate fi decât pentru diacriticele cu virgulă, nu numai pentru că ele sunt regula, ci și pentru că ele reprezintă metoda de input aflată în creștere. Dispozitivele mobile reprezintă un challenge pentru adopția noilor diacritice, însă ele au durata de viață scurtă - o schimbare în software se propagă în câteva luni, maxim un an la marea majoritate a utilizatorilor.--Strainu (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Am citit discutiile. Dar chiar daca utilizatorii continua sa foloseasca ambele variante, nu vad de ce bot-ul si gadget-ul de pe ro Wiki n-ar putea fi portate si pe en Wiki si Commons. Editorii scriu cum vor dar bot-ul corecteaza si ofera uniformitate.--Codrin.B (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corectează - unde? :) La ro.wp e simplu, corectează peste tot (s-au făcut eforturi să marcăm denumirile turcești, dar tot au mai scăpat unele), pe când la en.wp și la commons doar o mică parte din pagini sunt românești. Când am făcut redirectări virgulă->sedilă la en.wp, am rămas cu o listă (analizată manual) de vreo 12.000 de articole din peste 3 milioane. La commons am avut aceeași problemă - am vrut să fac redirectări și lumea s-a opus pentru că nu puteam să identific automat paginile la care trebuie lucrat.

Dacă ai o soluție pentru asta aș fi foarte fericit s-o aud.--Strainu (talk) 15:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pai ma gandesc ca bot-ul s-ar putea uita la tot ce e sub Category:Romania recursiv si daca gaseste o subcategorie, galerie etc. de genul Category:Night in Reşiţa sa o redenumeasca, mute si/sau sa faca redirect. Probabil ca va trebui sa aibe ceva lista de exceptii cu false-positives legate de Turcia, desi cred ca sunt minime si ar putea fi reparate manual dupa. De asemenea add-on de editor care corecteaza automat la salvare ar putea fi disponibil pentru editorii interesati atat pe en.wp cat si pe commons, ca optional. Am putea sa-i facem reclama pe COM:WikiProject Romania si alte canale.--Codrin.B (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Încearcă să propui asta și eu te voi susține. În cazul improbabil în care nu vei declanșa un val de proteste, pot să scriu eu robotul :)--Strainu (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pai mai e mult de scris la el? Iar gadget-ul/addon-ul pentru editor sunt gata nu? --Codrin.B (talk) 21:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:CFR Class 46 Locomotive 91-53-0-461-078-4.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Kobac (talk) 11:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Poarta sărutului 2.jpg

Yours sincerely Lophotrochozoa (talk) 23:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hotel_Select_in_Iaşi

Hotel Select in Iaşi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Razvan Socol (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stejarisu Church.jpg

File:Stejarisu Church.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 21:58, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arcul de triumf.jpg

File:Arcul de triumf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

128.250.5.245 07:45, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palatul Kretzulescu.jpg

File:Palatul Kretzulescu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

128.250.5.245 07:54, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS Noticeboard

Please see Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Files uploaded by Easykrunch from teatruldemagie.wordpress.com. Thanks, Razvan Socol (talk) 08:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Strainubot

Congratulations! You new bot task is approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk · contribs)

Could you please take care about categorization of this user images? Please also help him/her to improve categorization skills. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into the categorization. On the second request, I won't promise anything. It was already a big success to have him upload his pictures on commons.--Strainu (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

Hello Strainu, For Wiki Loves Monuments in Romania we would like some sentences be translated into Romanian. Who can translate the following sentences for the October template?

Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 is closed.
You may still share your images, but they will not be part of the competition.

You can translate it here or on my talk page. It would be appreciated to notify, but I will look again here soon. Thanks for the help in advance! Greetings - Romaine (talk) 00:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 s-a încheiat.
Puteți să vă încărcați în continuare imaginile, dar ele nu vor participa la concurs.

Didn't we have a similar text last year? I remember translating something like this, but I can't find it in my past contributions.--Strainu (talk) 09:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for translating! I have put the sentences into place here. It is possible that sentences like this were used last year, but then it was by hand I guess. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 09:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One question more, can you translate "Website of the contest" in Template:Upload campaign header wlm-ro/ro? Romaine (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Romaine (talk) 09:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:WLM-is-running-timestamp

Hi Strainu, thanks for the message!
Actually, I think I haven't even noticed your edit description, and simply edited that page and assumed that Romania (like the rest of the EU except for the UK and Portugal) uses UTC+2 in the summer. I have already fixed my mistake; thanks for letting me know and apologies for giving you additional work. odder (talk) 15:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andrei kokelburg (talk · contribs)

Could you please improve categorization of this user uploads? Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had a bot going over all the subcategories of Category:Historical monuments in Romania and add the categories directly so no categorization was lost. Using a template to categorize images into topic categories is not accepted at Commons and it took me a lot of time to clean it up so please don't add it again. Multichill (talk) 21:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you should have discussed this before doing it, as you're not the one getting the complaints. Your general contempt against bot rules is causing more and more trouble.

Second of all, you're big on words here. Commons:Categories is neither a policy nor a guideline. Furthermore, the exact phrasing is "topic categories should not be added through templates", not "must not". Also, there are other templates that include topic categories, such as Template:Blason-fr-en.

Finally, the template is also used outside of Wiki Loves Monuments, when I have no guarantee that you will keep running your robot. So I'm asking you to put that category system back in place. I'm not gonna put it back myself, but if you don't want to put it back, I will ask for arbitration here.--Strainu (talk) 08:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arcul de Triumf 2009-7.JPG

I put a request to undo this. Any thoughts/suggestions? --Codrin.B (talk) 19:36, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Strainu,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 09:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Convert all interlaced JPGs

Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate files uploaded by StrainuBot in 2011

Hello! I have found several duplicated files uploaded by StrainuBot as part of WLM 2011:

Can you please check if there were more duplicates and delete them? Thanks, Razvan Socol (talk) 12:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages using Information template with syntax errors

Hi Strainu. Do you have an idea how all those files should best get fixed? --Leyo 01:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems there is an extra "]]" at the end of the Author parameter, after the original file name. However, the original file name is also mentioned in the Source parameter, so we should remove it (leaving only "... at ro.wikipedia"). Razvan Socol (talk) 06:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strainu might do these fixes using his bot. --Leyo 13:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the 235 files that start with "RO", using AWB. Razvan Socol (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reducing the category content. --Leyo 21:21, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Strainu,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Caractere româneşti la Wikimedia Commons

Am folosit caracterele ş, respectiv ţ la categoria Category:Biserica de lemn din Băișești, deoarece toate celelalte categorii cu bisericile de lemn din judeţul Suceava sunt cu aceste caractere. Dacă ai posibilitatea, te rog să rulezi un bot care să transforme ş în ș şi ţ în ț pentru toate categoriile cu bisericile de lemn din Suceava.

De asemenea, te rog să revizuieşti licenţa pentru două poze similare fotografiei cu biserica de lemn din Băişeşti. Este vorba despre fotografia cu numele RO_SV_Dumbrava_Granicesti_wooden_church.jpg de la Wikimedia Commons. Multumesc.

Mă refer la faptul ca toate subcategoriile din categoria Category:Wooden churches in Suceava County să îşi păstreze numele, însă ş şi ţ să fie transformate în caracterele corecte româneşti (ș şi ț). Aş face manual asta, însă este foarte mult, deoarece trebuie modificată categoria de la fiecare fotografie în parte.

Fişierele de la ro.wikipedia [1], respectiv [2] pot fi şterse deoarece ele se regăsesc la Wikimedia Commons.

Până la rularea unui bot care se uniformizeze subcategoriile din Category:Wooden churches in Suceava County, subcategoria Category:Biserica de lemn din Băişeşti o las cu caracterele ş şi ţ. Numai bine!

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Strainu,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Bot error in December 2013

Please ensure errors like this do not happen again. Thank you. --Denniss (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for removing your upwizcampeditors

Hello Strainu, there is a discussion about a request regarding your Upload Wizard Campaign Editor userright, which have never been used or not used recently. You can participate discussion in Commons:Requests for rights#General request. If you have a reason that your upwizcampeditor be kept, please let us know. This is just a notification of discussion you may be involved. Best regards, — 레비 Revi.

Delivered on behalf of 레비 Revi by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redenumire Petrosani - Petroseni

Redenumirea fişierului care conţine stema din perioada interbelică a oraşului Petroşani () a fost realizată deoarece denumirea din perioada interbelică a municipiului Petroşani de astăzi era Petroşeni. Vezi documentul oficial (apărut în lucrarea Recensământul general al populației României din 29 decemvrie 1930, Vol. II), hărţile României interbelice din anul 1930 , respectiv din anul 1938 . De asemenea, pe pagina de wikipedia în română este menţionat: Istoria orașului Petroșani începe undeva pe la 1640, unde douăzeci de iobagi din Petros pot fi considerați primii locuitori ai acestui ținut. Comuna a purtat de la bun început numele de „Petroșeni”.

În afară de Petroşani, există şi alte oraşe care în perioada interbelică aveau denumiri diferite faţă de cele din prezent (asemănătoare sau chiar total diferite): Ploeşti (Ploieşti), Mercurea Ciuc (Miercurea Ciuc), Şimleul Silvaniei (Şimleu Silvaniei), Târgu Săcuesc (Târgu Secuiesc), Eforia (Eforie Nord), Carmen Sylva (Eforie Sud), Diciosânmartin (Târnăveni), Bazargic (Dobrici), Băile Slănic (Slănic Moldova), Cluj (Cluj-Napoca), Turnu Severin (Drobeta-Turnu Severin), Odorhei (Odorheiu Secuiesc), Sighet (Sighetu Marmaţiei), Suliţa (Noua Suliţă). Pentru mai multe detalii, vezi pagina Orașele interbelice ale Regatului României, la care încă mai am lucru. Numai bine!

filemover

Considering your level of experience, I've added the filemover right to your account. INeverCry 20:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Strainu (talk) 20:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muzeul de Istorie Națională și Arheologie din Constanța

Salut!

La 2013-10-08 ai creat Category:Palatul Comunal Constanța pentru imagini cladirei al Muzeu de Historie Naționala și Arheologie. Acest nume "Palatul Comunal" nu pare utilizat prea mult; articolul în Wikipedia nu-l menționează, și alte surse zic că "Palatul Comunal" este un nume al Muzeului de Arta Populara:

Poate Exterior of the Constanţa Museum of National History să fie un nume mai potrivit și clar?

Cu stima, Aisano (talk) 11:57, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eu m-am luat după lista monumentelor istorice și am evitat să mă refer la muzeu, ca să fie clar că în categoria respectivă trebuie puse fotografii cu clădirea. N-ar fi prima dată când lista e greșită. Sunt OK cu orice redenumire.--Strainu (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/135165704

Hi, why did you move that file? FDMS 4 12:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently I've mistaken the "reason" field for the "destination filename". The fact that the extension changed from JPG to jpg could be a bug in the JS mover, or perhaps I just changed it and forgot. I'll have to check that at some point.--Strainu (talk) 13:10, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The suffix decap by the gadget is intentional. However, why do you want to add - interior? I don't think that would be covered by our filemoving guidelines. FDMS 4 13:18, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I would have needed that rename for automatic insertion in the monuments list (avoiding details and interiors), but I can do without. Thanks for letting me know.--Strainu (talk) 13:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eroare la File:Noapte.jpg ?

Eu cred că nu este nicio eroare, imaginea corespunde cu [3] și [4], însă conacul a fost restaurat recent (vezi http://www.prinbihor.ro). Razvan Socol (talk) 16:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, prinbihor era chiar linkul pe care nu-l găseam :) Am scos câmpul. Oricum, nu e nevoie să treci prin mine pentru erori, lasă doar un comentariu în pagina de discuție ca să avem un istoric.--Strainu (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erori pe Str. Naum Râmniceanu?

În legătură cu fișierele File:Bucuresti, Romania, Imobilul nr. 1-3 de pe Str Naum Ramniceanu; B-II-m-B-19520 si B-II-m-B-19522 (vedere de ansamblu).JPG și File:Bucuresti, Romania, Imobil 2-4 pe Str. Naum Ramniceanu; B-II-m-B-19521 si B-II-m-B-19523 (vedere de ansamblu).JPG, eu nu văd nicio eroare: la nr. 1-3 avem această clădire, iar vizavi este clădirea aceasta. Singura chestie ciudată este că avem câte două coduri de monumente la câte o singură clădire. Razvan Socol (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mi s-a părut suspect aspectul clădirilor, dar nu aveam timp să caut atunci. Dacă zici că sunt OK, scoate parametrul eroare din format.--Strainu (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gata. Nu uita şi de întrebarea de mai sus, cu conacul. Razvan Socol (talk) 13:46, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mmoru. I already forwarded the email to permisiuni@wikimedia.org. Razvan Socol (talk) 06:39, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't the email bounce? AFAIK the valid addresses are:

permisiuni@wikipedia.org
permissions-ro@wikipedia.org
permissions-ro@wikimedia.org

Anyway, we didn't receive anything yet. After getting the ticket number, we need to launch another discussion at Commons:Undeletion_requests, right?--Strainu (talk) 08:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The message was sent to permisiuni@wikipedia.org on 25 oct 2014 at 13:08 EET. In the undeletion request we should also notify User:Andrei Stroe, to see if he still believes that those files should be deleted. Razvan Socol (talk) 08:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find anything, sorry. Please try again :)--Strainu (talk) 09:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored all the files in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mmoru per your request, and kept them. Make sure you add the OTRS ticket as soon as you get a chance. INeverCry 22:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Monuments api

Hi Strainu, I noticed your question on irc. The old api url at http://toolserver.org/~erfgoed/api/api.php redirects to https://tools.wmflabs.org/heritage/api/api.php . More info at Commons:Monuments database/API and related pages. Multichill (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Strainu (talk) 11:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mănăstirea Cheia

Salut! Ai adăugat câteva fișiere în Category:Mănăstirea Cheia, dar există deja Category:Cheia Monastery. Razvan Socol (talk) 13:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Chamber of Deputies meeting room.jpg

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Palatul Parlamentului

Bonjour Strainu. Si vous n'y voyez pas d'inconvénient, je préfère discuter en français sur un sujet aussi compliqué. Je vais essayer de clore moi-même la demande de suppression sur le Palais du Parlement. Le droit d'auteur roumain étant relativement proche de son équivalent français, je pense appliquer plus ou moins les mêmes critères pour départager les fichiers, en gardant notamment les panoramas généraux et les photos d'actualité (représentant un événement devant le palais, et non le palais lui-même). Au final, cela dit, la plupart des photos devront être supprimées. S'il est possible de les transférer sur la Wikipédia en roumain (sur la Wikipédia en français par exemple il y a une exception fr:Modèle:Bâtiment récent), il faudrait le faire rapidement. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 17:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jastrow: je transfere toutes les images utilisees chez ro.wp aussitot que j'apprend l'existence d'une requete de suppresion. Donc les images deja utilisees sont en securite. Si vous voyez d'autres requetes de supression sur des images de Roumanie, vous pouvez me laisser un message, ou bien utiliser le script User:Strainu/ExCommons.js pour les evacuer. C'est une version du MediaWiki:ExCommons.js qui peut etre utilisee par quiconque, a tout moment (l'original est destine aux admins, au moment de la supression). Le modele equivalent chez nous est ro:Format:FOP Romania (ou pour un autre pays, ro:Format:FOP avec le pays comme parametre).

Je suis biensur d'accord que la plupart des images doivent etre suprimees, il n'a jamais ete question de la garder toutes - vous pouvez considerer un vote delete pour toutes les images que je ne mentionne pas dans mes interventions. Je vous prie seulement de parcourir en bonne foi mes propositions d'images a garder.--Strainu (talk) 18:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:DenesfaCastel.jpg

Hi, I have requested deleting of this file. Here is the original one from huwiki: File:Denesfa-a kastely felujitott resze.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cluj_Rally

Category:Cluj_Rally has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

T.seppelt (talk) 07:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monument istoric

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Church_of_the_Heroes_of_the_Revolution&curid=44616992&diff=196539308&oldid=177342622: is the Church not part of the Monument istoric? Because we usually use that tag (and similar ones) on subcats that are part of the designated entity, and even use it on individual images. - Jmabel ! talk 00:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you shouldn't use it on subcategories, but only on the category best matching the monument. An exception is when the subcategory has a corresponding subcode (the ones with dot in the number).

The reason is that there are robots who use the code to categorize the images and also to add a category to the list (which in turn will allow future uploads to be categorized from the upload). If they find more than one category with the same code, they will just ignore it and the images will remain uncategorized.

Basically, the assumption is that if a category is tagged, all subcategories are also part of the monument.

Last night I removed codes from a bunch of categories in this case, so you might find other examples. --Strainu (talk) 06:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Not how we are using {{NRHP}} in the US, but I'll assume you know what you are doing. - Jmabel ! talk 16:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... Jean-Frédéric, can Erfgoetbot handle multiple categories tagged with the same code as described by Jmabel?--Strainu (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Romania in WLM

Hi Strainu, So far I know, no contest is planned for Wiki Loves Monuments in Romania, seeing Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016/Participating countries. If you are organising a local contest, please make it known on the participating countries page. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 16:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Romaine: Indeed, there is no contest planned. However, we invited our Facebook followers to contribute pictures if they feel like it, thus we would appreciate it if the {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2016}} template would still recognize Romania as a parameter.--Strainu (talk) 18:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, don't worry about it, I'll just create my own template, just to make sure the tools are not confused.--Strainu (talk) 19:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say, but this is worrying, it is not possible to invite users to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments in Romania if there is no contest. If you ask people to upload images it is fine, but this can't be as part of Wiki Loves Monuments. The name Wiki Loves Monuments cannot be used, as it does not meet the minimal criteria for local teams to participate. Therefore I renamed the template and category. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 21:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Romaine, please indicate the user page that contains the rules for the use of the logo and the name, so I can follow them.--Strainu (talk) 06:14, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2ndPrinceChun2.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2ndPrinceChun2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jcb, the file is a duplicate and can be deleted. I have marked it accordingly.--Strainu (talk) 08:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comenduirea Garnizoanei

La File:Cazinoul Militar din Timișoara 01.JPG și File:Cazinoul Militar din Timișoara 02.JPG am schimbat descrierea. Nu este Cazinoul Militar, ci Comenduirea Garnizoanei („Generalatul”). Această clădire, situată pe latura de sud a pieței, nu este în LMI, deși ar trebui să fie, deoarece este una dintre cele mai vechi clădiri. Clădirea Cazinoului Militar, monument istoric, este pe latura de vest a pieței. Muzeul Militar este, într-adevăr, în clădirea comenduirii, nu în cea a cazinoului. Numerele din piață oscilează după surse între 4 și 7, este incredibil câte informații false sunt vehiculate. Cea mai corectă sursă este asta. --Turbojet (talk) 19:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

E în regulă, mulțumesc. Am trecut prin poze la aproape 2 luni după ce-am fost acolo și nu mai știam exact ce și cum, m-am bazat pe OSM + google.--Strainu (talk) 19:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A, nu e vina ta, ai luat informația de la cIMeC. Ei, ca sursa cea mai „de încredere”, știu greșit. Și de la ei au luat informația majoritatea site-urilor care se ocupă cu turismul, astfel că informația greșită apare în multe „surse”.

Toți greșim, eu trebuie să corectez planul ăla cu LMI din Cetate, codul „43” se referă doar la jumătatea de nord. Cea de sud e altă clădire, unde s-a mutat „Casa Armatei”, care înainte era la comenduire, dar pe aia au cedat-o primăriei. O să corectez. --Turbojet (talk) 20:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Rfc: Should we request a configuration change to shut down cross-wiki uploads?

Hi, it looks live you've voiced your position twice in that RFC. FDMS 4 15:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know FDMS4, I had forgotten about the previous intervention. I moved the latest argument together with my vote.--Strainu (talk) 15:16, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing Campaign:wcai-id

Hello Strainu,

I am a Commons contributor from Indonesia. Wikimedia Indonesia in June this year will conduct Wiki Cinta Alam Indonesia (WCAI) campaign, similar to Wiki Loves Monument. We would like to have our own Campaign page where participants will upload their photos of Indonesia landscapes to Commons, like Netherlands do: Campaign:wlm-nl. Could you please assist us how to set up this campaign page? We appreciate your help. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 10:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Rachmat04. Just let me know what it should be called and how are the custom fields named.--Strainu (talk) 10:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have modified some codes from other Campaign page, and you may find it here: User:Rachmat04/Campaign:wcai-id. That page should be entitled "Wiki Cinta Alam Indonesia (WCAI) 2017", and page address should be located at Campaign:wcai-id. Should you need other information, please let me know. Thanks for your help! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Please note that File:Wiki Cinta Alam Indonesia 2017 tutorial.png does not seem to exist, so the tutorial is currently skipped.--Strainu (talk) 07:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Actually, we're doing the tutorial image. We'll let you know once it's available on Commons. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, a user tried to upload an image via Campaign:wcai-id page. If I'm not mistaken, Category:Wiki Cinta Alam Indonesia 2017 should be automatically filled on the upload form. However, it failed during my trial so the category box left empty. Could you please look into the glitch? Thank you. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That should have gone in the "defaults" section. Please try now.--Strainu (talk) 08:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thank you for your help! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Licence review

Hi Strainu, it was brought to my attention that about a year ago you uploaded two files from external sources and gave them a licence review yourself. These are File:Coma - lansare album Orizont.jpg and File:Xenofon București by Laura Burcus.jpg in particular. Please note that per Commons:License review, "image-reviewers may not review their own uploads unless the account is an approved bot." Strainubot has not uploaded anything since 2014, so you shouldn't have approved these external licenses yourself. For future uploads from sources needing review, please tag the files with {{LicenseReview}} and let others review them. Thank you, De728631 (talk) 13:16, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this to my attention De728631. I'll make sure to leave my uploads for others to review in the future. Strainu (talk) 14:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any other files you uploaded and reviewed yourself? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 05:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also found File:Gara Zalău.jpg. De728631, could you please take a look? Panoramio is dead, but perhaps there is another way to verify the license. Thanks. Strainu (talk) 10:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done I was lucky to find an archived version of the Panoramio page where I could verify the licence. De728631 (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files without permission

I don't see the image at the source, but I guess these were supposed to have OTRS like the others from that forum? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 05:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same OTRS, yes. The original images should be:

Strainu (talk) 07:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an OTRS agent, but you may want to ask one to add the permission. There is (without OTRS access) no tangible proof of any valid license. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verified & added the template. --Turbojet (talk) 06:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WLM: European Special Award - European Cultural Heritage

Dear Strainu,

as one of this year's local WLM organizers, we want to let you know about a special award being distributed this year.

With 2018 being the European Year of Cultural Heritage, operating with the slogan “Sharing Heritage”, Wikimedia Deutschland is participating in this Europe-wide project with various activities.

One aspect is a special award that will be given within the WLM contest for the pictures that best capture European Cultural Heritage (the final formulation for the criteria will be published soon). An international jury will be choosing the winners from the national submissions made by the national juries to the international WLM contest.

The following prizes will be awarded to the winners:

1 – Up to € 1000 in in-kind prize,

2 – Up to € 700 in in-kind prize,

3 – Up to € 300 in in-kind prize.

We invite you to spread this information in your national contest and with your national jury, making them aware of this special opportunity. The winners will be announced at the end of the year. More info on criteria and distribution will be published soon on the international WLM site. The German project site can be found here.

In case you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Enjoy the summer and the heat and with kind regards from Berlin, --Maria Heuschkel (WMDE) (talk) 13:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riverside tower in Bucharest.jpg

File:Riverside tower in Bucharest.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue eyes (3517762633).jpg

File:Blue eyes (3517762633).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Strainu,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Strainu,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This edit - who is the author?

Hi This edit changed the author. If you look at the page there is no name above the first image and it have a different date than the one where Cristina Albu & Radu Czech is mentioned. Could you have another look? And thank you for the review :-) --MGA73 (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HI MGA73 and thanks for moving these images. You are correct. For some reason I believed the attribution was below the image. I'll correct it. Strainu (talk) 14:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All good! Great! --MGA73 (talk) 14:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Râul Măieruș 2.jpg

File:Râul Măieruș 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Strainu (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Strainu,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

License review needed

Hello Strainu, can you please review below mentioned file: File:2020 inauguration of Alexander Lukashenko.png TagMorgan (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry TagMorgan, but that movie is not licensed under a CC license. I had to provide a negative review. Please see COM:YT for which YouTube videos are eligible for transfer to commons.--Strainu (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VRTS

Bună, ai vreun update legat de Special:Diff/605257790? Formatul m-a îndemnat să te întreb pe tine, dar pot să mă adresez și la VRT noticeboard. Gikü (talk) 12:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Da, primisem confirmarea chiar a doua zi, dar probabil am omis sa fac schimbarea. Rezolvat, mulțumesc pentru reamintire. Strainu (talk) 19:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monaco Tower seen from the balcony.jpg

File:Monaco Tower seen from the balcony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stația Piața Romană (ian 2024).jpg

File:Stația Piața Romană (ian 2024).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User talk:Strainu

TUSC token 752838f275954e272a790bc4be107d00

Tip: Categorizing images

Biserica_greaca

nu ma descurajez

Interviu WLM

Please give images better names

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

ORTS check

GPS-ul

File:Dacia kaerius.jpg, File:Dacia lorenz fries.jpg etc

Imagini din cărțile lui Cornel Lupea

Wiki Loves Monuments Romania

Colaborare cu Dacoromanica.ro

Muzeul Național al Hărților și Cărții Vechi

Raspunsuri

Diacritice pe Commons

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

OTRS Noticeboard

Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk · contribs)

Translation request

Re:WLM-is-running-timestamp

Andrei kokelburg (talk · contribs)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Duplicate files uploaded by StrainuBot in 2011

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Caractere româneşti la Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Bot error in December 2013

Request for removing your upwizcampeditors

Redenumire Petrosani - Petroseni

filemover

Muzeul de Istorie Națională și Arheologie din Constanța

Eroare la File:Noapte.jpg ?

Erori pe Str. Naum Râmniceanu?

OTRS

Monuments api

Mănăstirea Cheia

Notification about possible deletion

Palatul Parlamentului

Monument istoric

Romania in WLM

File source is not properly indicated: File:2ndPrinceChun2.jpg

Comenduirea Garnizoanei

Proposing Campaign:wcai-id

Licence review

Files without permission

WLM: European Special Award - European Cultural Heritage

Important message for file movers

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

This edit - who is the author?

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România!

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

License review needed

VRTS

I'm amused how close we came to taking the same photo

Navigation menu

Search