Commons:Textured 3D

Tracked in Phabricator
Task T246901

Wikimedia Commons doesn't support textured 3D models at the moment, this page is here to track the progress to change that. It will also contain a list of resources and links to get involved, as well as some example 3D models, that would fit on Commons in the future.

Significant urgency due to current developments

The current issues surrounding Sketchfab show how important a non-commercial platform for sharing and visualising textured 3D models would be. Tens of thousands of 3D models under free licences are under threat, and in a petition to Sketchfab it is said that "this is the virtual equivalent of burning the Library of Alexandria". Here is a petition with lots of background information.

Technical progress

• Support full colour 3D models on Wikimedia projects: Main bug on Phabricator
• Support for GLTF Similar bugs on Phabricator

Discussions

• Support textured meshes on Commons
• Larger Proposal

Technical realisation

Formats

There are several open standards for textured 3D models. Concrete wishes for integration exist for the following formats:

• .blend T187867
• .obj T184803
• .ply T195352
• .glb T187844

The glTF (Graphics Library Transmission Format) file format is an open standard for textured three-dimensional scenes and models (ISO/IEC 12113:2022). The extension .glb is the binary version of this format. Work has already been carried out for this format to extend the MediaWiki Extension:3D.

Technical realisation to date

The following components would need to be revised for .glb support:

• System change: core's mime.info
• Update Extension:3D
• Update 3d2png thumbnail generator

• During the Wikimedia Hackathon 2024, work has already been carried out to support the .glb format WIP 1026883.
  • Adds three.js (r164) and webpack to npm dev deps
  • grunt 'build' task to rebuild a fresh three.js
  • bundles GLTFLoader and STLLoader

• Based on this work, a prototype for a viewer was developed. This also supports KTX2 compression. STL & GLB models can be selected, and own models can be uploaded.
  • Website
  • GitHub

• All components for this prototype of a Wikipedia website have already been reworked.

Content to better integrate in this article:

Featuring 3D renderings of notable objects and places offers great opportunities for improving Wikipedia articles by making them both more engaging for readers whilst also helping them better comprehend the subject.

Support for featuring 3D renderings of objects has become increasingly common and better supported on the internet generally; however this support is not currently matched on Wikimedia Commons thereby limiting Wikipedia's ability to feature 3D objects.

As stated in a blog post on the publication of the original basic 3D support in Commons (source below):

In the future, after feedback from our community of volunteer editors, we’ll consider adding support for even more complex file types that support features like textures.

The time to add support for these features is now. Most modern smartphones are able to create 3D-Scans of smaller objects or even complete buildings rights now and there is no way to upload and display them in Wikimedia projects! There are several large sources of free textured 3D models.

Possible use cases of colorful, interactive and complex 3d models in Wikipedia articles:

• models of extinct species like dinosaur reconstructions
• the inside of historical rooms (example)
• all kinds of smaller interesting objects

This is great, but pretty boring. We need color! ;)

Resources:

• Upcoming presentation at Wikimania about this topic
• Commons page describing the support at the moment
• Old Discussion: Hosting files for 3D models and a user page proposal
• Wishlist Survey 2016, where support for STL was added and related blog post
• Task to track the new implementation
• Poster for Wikimania by Discott

Wikimania poster and meetup

Poster by Discott that will be displayed at Wikimania 2023.

WMF C-Levels and other staff talking about how to best action 3D support on Wikipedia.

I have a number of photogrametric 3D models on Commons, all of which would benefit from texturing: even in simple cases, texturing gives indications of materials (is a statue made of bronze, marble, clay...?), and conveys verisimilitude through little details such as weathering or ambient occlusion.

No indication of material, and scarcety of details

• 
  Terracotta object renders like clay
• 
  Plaster object renders like clay
• 
  Marble object renders like clay

More importantly, some models suffer greatly from being only clay models: for instance polychrome archaeological artefacts are improperly represented by clay models.

Without textures polygons are visible and things hard to discern

polychrome archaeological artefact improperly represented by an untextured models

• 
  polychrome archaeological artefact improperly represented by an untextured model: 3D clay model gives volumes but misrepresents colours
• 
  polychrome archaeological artefact improperly represented by an untextured model: photograph gives colours but not volumes
• 
  Model looks damaged (nose)
• 
  Texture gives information that the damage is on the object rather than on the 3D model.

Finally, on the technical side, not having textures forces us to upload high polygon models. The possibility to embed bump maps and displacement maps would allow conveying the same amount of detail with much smaller models (one order of magnitude fewer polygons at least).